8 Comments

I agree that the tweet contains the person's interpretation, which may or may not be correct as well the viral part, but your claim about PCR..

I disagree: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-eadh8x4Mc

"with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody"

"if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure which pcr can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them"

The video has interesting things for someone to listen to.

After all, he is the creator of PCR.

Also, the "only 6%" "myth" is not really a myth. It's a fact. CDC did report that only 6% had only covid. The other percent had other underlying disease(s). The part "quietly updated", I can't really tell, could be drama. The thing is, if you only have covid and you die, the cause is covid. If you have covid and underlying disease(s), then what really killed you? I think that's the debate that's troubling everyone, death FROM covid vs. death WITH covid

Finally, your post contains a mix of medical/political/belief matters, which indicates to me that you rush to judge against QAnons than actually interpreting what they say and look their viewpoint. I won't go into debate whether what you stand for is wrong or correct. This is your opinion based on scientific data, and this is my opinion based on scientific data. Medicine is a science where things can never be absolute (actually nothing can be absolute, even in IT where everything is 0,1), things were and will always be debatable and this must be respected. You are free to disagree with my opinion, as I am as well

Expand full comment